ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:Non-free use rationale guideline: ಪರಿಷ್ಕರಣೆಗಳ ನಡುವಿನ ವ್ಯತ್ಯಾಸ
Content deleted Content added
changes, per talk |
rv -- this is not what the policy requires. If you're going to try to rewrite the meaning of WP:NFC, then it needs to be discussed at WT:NFC itself, not on a backwater subsidiary talkpage |
||
೧೫ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
* What proportion of the copyrighted work is used and to what degree does it compete with the copyright holder's usage? For example, if the image is a photograph or logo, the entire work is likely being used. A [[screenshot]] that reveals the most important discovery of a documentary or the ending of a movie, for example, though a very small portion of the work, may disproportionately compete with the copyright holder's use. In the case of a [[Wikipedia:Music samples|music sample]], the length should be no longer than 10 percent of the song's original length or 30 seconds, whichever is shorter.
* If applicable, has the resolution been reduced from the original? In the case of music samples, has the quality been reduced from the original?
*
** Is the image a logo, photograph, or box art for the main subject of the article?
** Is the image being used as the primary means of visual identification of the subject or topic? (e.g., a corporate logo or the box art of a DVD)
**
** Is it used for commentary on a particular topic? How?
*
▲* Why is the image not replaceable with a [[free content]] image, or with a textual description?
** If the image is a screenshot of a movie that is used for an article about the movie, or a corporate logo, there is obviously no such thing as a "free" version of it - all of the resources in the world could not produce one. If, on the other hand, the image is a photograph, the image is more easily replaced, even if Wikipedians may lack the resources to create a replacement.
* Any other information necessary to assist others in determining whether the use of this image qualifies for fair use.
|