"ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:Non-free use rationale guideline" ಆವೃತ್ತಿಗಳ ಮಧ್ಯದ ಬದಲಾವಣೆಗಳು

rv -- this is not what the policy requires. If you're going to try to rewrite the meaning of WP:NFC, then it needs to be discussed at WT:NFC itself, not on a backwater subsidiary talkpage
(changes, per talk)
(rv -- this is not what the policy requires. If you're going to try to rewrite the meaning of WP:NFC, then it needs to be discussed at WT:NFC itself, not on a backwater subsidiary talkpage)
* What proportion of the copyrighted work is used and to what degree does it compete with the copyright holder's usage? For example, if the image is a photograph or logo, the entire work is likely being used. A [[screenshot]] that reveals the most important discovery of a documentary or the ending of a movie, for example, though a very small portion of the work, may disproportionately compete with the copyright holder's use. In the case of a [[Wikipedia:Music samples|music sample]], the length should be no longer than 10 percent of the song's original length or 30 seconds, whichever is shorter.
* If applicable, has the resolution been reduced from the original? In the case of music samples, has the quality been reduced from the original?
* WhyWhat ispurpose thisdoes the image of vital importanceserve toin the article? If applicable:
** Is the image a logo, photograph, or box art for the main subject of the article?
** Is the image being used as the primary means of visual identification of the subject or topic? (e.g., a corporate logo or the box art of a DVD)
** IsDoes it necessary to understandillustrate the topic of the article? Why?(e.g., a screen shot from a movie)
** Is it used for commentary on a particular topic? How?
** Is it necessary to support a point of sourced commentary in the text? Which point and how?
* WhyTo what degree is the image not replaceable withby a [[free content]] image, or with a textual description?
** Is the image itself the object of sourced discussion in the article, and necessary to understand that discussion? How?
* Why is the image not replaceable with a [[free content]] image, or with a textual description?
** If the image is a screenshot of a movie that is used for an article about the movie, or a corporate logo, there is obviously no such thing as a "free" version of it - all of the resources in the world could not produce one. If, on the other hand, the image is a photograph, the image is more easily replaced, even if Wikipedians may lack the resources to create a replacement.
* Any other information necessary to assist others in determining whether the use of this image qualifies for fair use.

edit

"https://kn.wikipedia.org/wiki/ವಿಶೇಷ:MobileDiff/448174" ಇಂದ ಪಡೆಯಲ್ಪಟ್ಟಿದೆ