ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:Good article criteria/GAC
Usage
ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿExample:
{{WP:Good article criteria/GAC|1a}}
yields:
- the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct
Each criterion
ಬದಲಾಯಿಸಿ1 | Well written |
1a | the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct |
1b | it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation |
2 | Verifiable with no original research |
2a | it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline |
2b | all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines |
2c | it contains no original research |
2d | it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism |
3 | Broad in its coverage |
3a | it addresses the main aspects of the topic |
3b | it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style) |
4 | Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each |
5 | Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute |
6 | Illustrated, if possible, by images |
6a | images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content |
6b | images are to the topic, and have suitable captions |