ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:ಅರಳಿ ಕಟ್ಟೆ: ಪರಿಷ್ಕರಣೆಗಳ ನಡುವಿನ ವ್ಯತ್ಯಾಸ

Content deleted Content added
೫೬೩ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
It is very sad to see blocking process happened in this way. I am writing this purely from my personal motivation but not with any interest or concern about blocking [[User:Lokesha kunchadka|Lokesha kunchadka]]. But I have opposition for the way bureaucrat handled this process. I will list out the policies which bureaucrat did not abide by.
Firstly, in the warning [[User:Pavanaja|Pavanaja]] said on Lokesha's [https://kn.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B2%B8%E0%B2%A6%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%AF%E0%B2%B0_%E0%B2%9A%E0%B2%B0%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%9A%E0%B3%86%E0%B2%AA%E0%B3%81%E0%B2%9F:Lokesha_kunchadka#Newbie_biting talkpage] {{Quotation|Many new editors are coming to Kannada Wikipedia because of editathons. I have noticed that you are simply going on adding templates to the articles by these new editors. This is not going to be of much help. The action by you of adding templates to almost every article by new editors will be considered as newbie biting. Your aim may be improving the quality of articles in Kannada Wikipedia, but the outcome might be that the new editors will simply quit editing. Instead of adding these templates, I suggest you to improve the articles and and show the editors how exactly an article can be improved. That example will help the editors rather than the templates added by you. You may even create a tutorial on improving the quality of an article. If you can't do that I reprimand from adding templates to articles at random and doing newbie biting. This is also a warning to you to desist from doing so.--ಪವನಜ ಯು. ಬಿ. (ಚರ್ಚೆ) ೦೯:೧೨, ೧೨ ಅಕ್ಟೋಬರ್ ೨೦೧೯ (UTC)}}
There is no link to the policy and it is not clear what template he was adding and under newbie biting which policy he did not follow. Editor may not know the policy so admin must cite policy pages either in Kannada or English. Newbie biting policy and guidelines are [[:en:WP:Please do not bite the newcomers|here]] and [[:en:WP:Please bite the newbies|here]]. In this case it is the duty of the administrator to give proper citation to the policy and educate before blocking, which is not. Also as I can see the blocked user is only adding “references needed” tags, which is not at all newbie biting. If newbies are getting demotivated by just seeing those tags, it organisers’ responsibility to explain the importance of such tags. If a user doesn’t learn how to receive constructive criticism at the beginning, it will be very problematic when they grow as a user, and eventually affecting the quality of content produced. If a users sends continuous talk page warning, that may count as newbie biting but not this. This should be discussed with the community than just one person deciding on what newbie biting is. And [[User:Arpitha05|Arpitha05]] told {{Quotation|ನಾನು ಆ ಲೇಖನಗಳಿಗೆ ಅಗತ್ಯವಿರುವ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖಗಳನ್ನು, ಇನ್ಫೋಬಾಕ್ಸ್, ಆಂತರಿಕ ಮತ್ತು ಬಾಹ್ಯ ಕೊಂಡಿಗಳನ್ನು ಸೇರಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದೇನೆ. ಅಕ್ಷರಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ವಾಕ್ಯಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ತಪ್ಪಿದ್ದಲ್ಲಿ ಅದನ್ನೂ ಸರಿಪಡಿಸಿ ಲೇಖನ ಸೇರಿಸಿದ ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿನಿಯರಿಗೆ ಅದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ತಿಳಿಸಿದ್ದೇನೆ ಕೂಡ. ಇದಲ್ಲದೆ ಕೆಲವು ಲೇಖನಗಳ ವಯಕ್ತಿಕ ಜೀವನ ಎಂಬ ವಿಭಾಗವನ್ನು ತೆಗೆದಿದ್ದಾರೆ.}} Kindly give the links so that community also can understand that problem. <br>
 
While blocking a proper [[:en:WP:EXPLAINBLOCK|explanation]] and evidence should be given with links, which are not at all seen here. Please provide the evidence of harassing new women Wikipedian. So that community understands the actual situation. And it’s clearly mentioned {{Quotation|Block reasons should avoid the use of jargon as much as possible so that blocked users may better understand them.}} Here admin used “you are indulging in whataboutery”. User many not even understand this. I had to go to a dictionary to see the meaning of the words because it’s Kannada Wikipedia. Block reason could have at least translated. Also please provide links to where you have previously warned the user in question, on Wikipedia about this matter. It was stated that there have been multiple warning given. <br>