ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:Biographies of living persons: ಪರಿಷ್ಕರಣೆಗಳ ನಡುವಿನ ವ್ಯತ್ಯಾಸ
Content deleted Content added
ಭಾಗಶಹ ಅನುವಾದ |
ಚು ಬೋಟ್: ಸ್ಥಿರೀಕರಿಸುವ ಪುನರ್ನಿರ್ದೇಶನಗಳು |
||
೧ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
{{policy | [[ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:Biographies of living persons|WP:LIVING]] [[ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:Biographies of living persons|WP:BLP]]}}
{{policy in a nutshell|Wikipedia articles can affect real people's lives. This gives us an ethical and legal responsibility. Biographical material must be written with the greatest care and attention to [[Wikipedia:verifiability|verifiability]], [[
ಸಂಪಾದಕರು '''ಬದುಕಿರುವ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಗಳ ಜೀವನಚರಿತ್ರೆ ಮಾಹಿತಿ'''ಯನ್ನು ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ ಪುಟಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಸೇರಿಸುವಾಗ ವಿಶೇಷ ಎಚ್ಚರಿಕೆ ವಹಿಸ ಬೇಕು. ಅಂತಹ ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ ಒಂದು ಮಟ್ಟದ ಸೂಕ್ಷ್ಮತೆಯ ಅಗತ್ಯವಿರುತ್ತದೆ ಮತ್ತು ಮಾಹಿತಿಯನ್ನು ತುಂಬುವ ನೀತಿಗಳಿಗೆ "ಕಟ್ಟುನಿಟ್ಟಾಗಿ" ಅನುಸರಿಸ ಬೇಕು.
೨೬ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
== Writing style ==
{{shortcut|[[WP:BLPSTYLE]]}}
Biographies of living people should be written responsibly, conservatively, and in a neutral, encyclopedic tone. While a strategy of [[m:Eventualism|eventualism]] may apply to other subject areas, badly written biographies of living persons should be [[WP:stub|stubbed]] or [[
The article should document, in a non-partisan manner, what reliable [[third party]] sources have published about the subject and, [[#Using the subject as a self-published source|in some circumstances]], what the subject may have published about themselves. The writing style should be neutral, factual, and understated, avoiding both a sympathetic point of view and an [[advocacy journalism]] point of view.
೩೨ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
==Sources==
===Reliable sources===
Any assertion in a biography of a living person that might be [[slander and libel|defamatory]] if untrue must be sourced. Without [[
Material available solely on partisan websites or in obscure newspapers should be handled with caution, and, if derogatory, should not be used at all. '''Material found in [[self-publishing|self-published]] books, [[zine]]s, websites and [[blog]]s should never be used''', unless written or published by the subject ([[#Using the subject as a source|see below]]). These sources should also not be included as [[WP:EL|external links]] in BLPs, subject to the same exception.
೮೩ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
=== Well known public figures ===
In the case of significant [[public figure|public figures]], there will be a multitude of [[
: '''Example''': "John Doe had a messy divorce from Jane Doe." Is it important to the article, and has it been published by third-party reliable sources? If not, leave it out.
೮೯ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
: '''Example''': A politician is alleged to have had an affair. He denies it, but the ''[[New York Times]]'' publishes the allegations, and there is a public scandal. The allegation may belong in the biography, citing the ''New York Times'' as the source.
Material from primary sources should be used with great care. For example, public records that include personal details such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses, as well as trial transcripts and other court records, should not be used unless cited by a reliable secondary source. Where primary-source material has first been presented by a reliable secondary source, it ''may'' be acceptable to turn to open records to augment the secondary source, subject to the [[
===People who are relatively unknown===
೧೦೦ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The bare fact that someone has been in the news does not in itself imply that they should be the subject of an encyclopedia entry. Where a person is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about a larger subject, but remains of essentially low profile themselves, we should generally avoid having an article on them.
If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted. Marginal biographies on people with no independent notability can give undue weight to the events in the context of the individual, create redundancy and additional maintenance overhead, and cause problems for our [[
===Privacy of birthdays===
೧೦೬ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
==Criticism==
The views of critics should be represented if their views are relevant to the subject's notability and are based on reliable secondary sources, and so long as the material is written in a manner that does not overwhelm the article or appear to side with the critics' material. Be careful not to give a disproportionate amount of space to critics, to avoid the effect of [[
Content should be sourced to [[
===Biased or malicious content===
೧೭೯ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
== See also ==
;Relevant policies
* [[ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:ತಟಸ್ಥ ದೃಷ್ಟಿಕೋನ|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]]
* [[Wikipedia:No original research]]
* [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]
೧೯೪ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
;Relevant guidelines
* [[ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:Identifying reliable sources|Wikipedia:Reliable sources]]
* [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)]]
* [[Wikipedia:Autobiography]]
|