ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ

ಟೆಂಪ್ಲೇಟು:Grading scheme: ಪರಿಷ್ಕರಣೆಗಳ ನಡುವಿನ ವ್ಯತ್ಯಾಸ

Browse history interactively
← ಹಿಂದಿನ ಸಂಪಾದನೆನಂತರದ ಸಂಪಾದನೆ →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
imported>Andersmusician
ಚು REVERTING LAS REV:I think variables should have "_" instead of spaces (learned that at school)
wikitable
೧ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
{| class="wikitable"
{| valign="top" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="1"
|+ '''Article progress grading scheme''' '''[ {{Tnavbar|Grading scheme|mini=1|nodiv=1}} ]'''
|-
! Label
| {{chembox header}} colspan = 1 | Label
| {{chembox header}} colspan = 1 |! Criteria
| {{chembox header}} colspan = 1 |! Reader's experience
| {{chembox header}} colspan = 1 |! Editor's experience
! Example
| {{chembox header}} colspan = 1 | Example
|-
| {{FA-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|FA-Class}}</small>
| {{chembox style}} | Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "[[Wikipedia:Featured articles|Featured article]]" status, and meet the [[WP:WIAFA|current criteria for featured articles]].
| {{chembox style}} | Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information.
| {{chembox style}} | No further editing is necessary unless new published information has come to light; but further improvements to the text are often possible.
| {{chembox style}} | {{{FA_example|[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tourette_syndrome&oldid=124643968 Tourette Syndrome] (as of April 2007)}}}
|-
| {{A-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|A-Class}}</small>
| {{chembox style}} | Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in [[Wikipedia:How to write a great article|How to write a great article]]. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" ([[Peer review|peer-reviewed]] where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article|featured article]] status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard.
| {{chembox style}} | Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points.
| {{chembox style}} | Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. [[Wikipedia:Peer review|Peer-review]] would be helpful at this stage.
| {{chembox style}} | {{{A_example|[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Durian&oldid=115213790 Durian] (as of March 2007)}}}
|-
| {{GA-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|GA-Class}}</small>
| {{chembox style}} | The article has passed through the [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|Good article nomination process]] and been granted GA status, meeting the [[WP:WIAGA|good article standards]]. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise acceptable. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the [[Wikipedia:Good article|Good article]] designation process is not a requirement for A-Class.
| {{chembox style}} | Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job.
| {{chembox style}} | Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully [[:Category:Articles_that_need_to_be_wikified|wikified]], now is the time.
| {{chembox style}} |{{{GA_example|[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Space_Station&oldid=102210806 International Space Station] (as of February 2007)}}}
|-
| {{B-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|B-Class}}</small>
| {{chembox style}} | Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a ''majority'' of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, [[WP:NPOV|Neutral Point Of View (NPOV)]] or [[WP:NOR|No Original Research (NOR)]]. With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the [[WP:WIAGA|Good article criteria]] should be B- or Start-class articles.
| {{chembox style}} | Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work.
| {{chembox style}} | Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which [[Wikipedia:cleanup|cleanup]] is needed will typically have this designation to start with.
| {{chembox style}} | {{{B_example|[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Munich_air_disaster&oldid=55586445 Munich air disaster] (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content and references.}}}
|-
| {{Start-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|Start-Class}}</small>
| {{chembox style}} | The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any '''one''' of the following:
*a particularly useful picture or graphic
*multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
*a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
*multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
| {{chembox style}} | Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded.
| {{chembox style}} | Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article [[Wikipedia:Cleanup|cleanup]] tag is inappropriate at this stage.
| {{chembox style}} | {{{Start_example|[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Real_analysis&oldid=81105845 Real analysis] (as of November 2006)}}}
|-
| {{Stub-Class}}<br /><small>{{tl|Stub-Class}}</small>
| {{chembox style}} | The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.
| {{chembox style}} | Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition.
| {{chembox style}} | Any editing or additional material can be helpful.
| {{chembox style}} | {{{Stub_example|[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coffee_table_book&oldid=19451333 Coffee table book] (as of July 2005)}}}
|}<noinclude>
----
"https://kn.wikipedia.org/wiki/ಟೆಂಪ್ಲೇಟು:Grading_scheme" ಇಂದ ಪಡೆಯಲ್ಪಟ್ಟಿದೆ