ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ:Good article criteria: ಪರಿಷ್ಕರಣೆಗಳ ನಡುವಿನ ವ್ಯತ್ಯಾಸ

Content deleted Content added
ಚು Reverted edits by 109.157.247.65 (talk) to last version by Webclient101
೪ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
A [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] is a satisfactory article that has met the '''good article criteria''' but may not have met the [[Wikipedia:Featured article criteria|criteria]] for [[Wikipedia:Featured articles|featured articles]].<noinclude><ref>Good articles are only measured against the good article criteria; at the time of assessment, they may or may not meet featured article criteria.</ref></noinclude> <noinclude>The good article criteria measure ''decent'' articles; they are [[Wikipedia:Compare Criteria Good v. Featured|not as demanding]] as the featured article criteria, which determine our ''best'' articles.</noinclude>
<noinclude>
'''Bold text'''==Criteria==
An article can be failed without further review if, prior to the review, it has cleanup banners that are obviously still valid. These include {{tl|cleanup}}, {{tl|POV}}, {{tl|unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{tl|fact}}, {{tl|citation needed}}, {{tl|clarifyme}}, or similar tags. (See also {{tl|QF-tags}}). If the article is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria then it can be failed without being placed on hold. If copyright infringements are found in a nominated article then it can be failed without further review. In all other cases a full review against the six criteria is to be conducted and the nominator given a chance to address any issues.