ಸದಸ್ಯ:Navamadi.s/ನನ್ನ ಪ್ರಯೋಗಪುಟ: ಪರಿಷ್ಕರಣೆಗಳ ನಡುವಿನ ವ್ಯತ್ಯಾಸ
Content deleted Content added
Navamadi.s (ಚರ್ಚೆ | ಕಾಣಿಕೆಗಳು) No edit summary |
Navamadi.s (ಚರ್ಚೆ | ಕಾಣಿಕೆಗಳು) No edit summary |
||
೭ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
'''Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing sources within the provisions of this and other content policies is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia. Best practice is to research the most reliable sources on the topic and summarize what they say in your own words, with each statement in the article attributable to a source that makes that statement explicitly. Source material should be carefully summarized or rephrased without changing its meaning or implication. Take care not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources, or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intention of the source, such as using material out of context. In short, stick to the sources.
If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery.
▲'''In general, the most reliable sources are:
peer-reviewed journals
books published by university presses
Line ೧೯ ⟶ ೧೮:
Primary, secondary and tertiary sources[ಮೂಲವನ್ನು ಸಂಪಾದಿಸು]
Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and to avoid novel interpretations of primary sources. All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than to an original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors.
|