ಸದಸ್ಯ:Navamadi.s/ನನ್ನ ಪ್ರಯೋಗಪುಟ: ಪರಿಷ್ಕರಣೆಗಳ ನಡುವಿನ ವ್ಯತ್ಯಾಸ
Content deleted Content added
Navamadi.s (ಚರ್ಚೆ | ಕಾಣಿಕೆಗಳು) No edit summary |
Navamadi.s (ಚರ್ಚೆ | ಕಾಣಿಕೆಗಳು) No edit summary |
||
೨ ನೇ ಸಾಲು:
ಮೂಲ ಸಂಶೋಧನೆಯ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ನಿಷೇಧದ ಅರ್ಥ ಲೇಖನಗಳು ವಾಸ್ತವವಾಗಿ ಆರೋಪವಾಗಿಲ್ಲ ಎಂದರು, ಅದಕ್ಕೆ ಸೇರಿಸುವ ಎಲ್ಲಾ ವಸ್ತು ಒಂದು ವಿಶ್ವಾಸಾರ್ಹ ಪ್ರಕಟಿತ ಮೂಲ ಆರೋಪವಾಗಿರಬೇಕು.
ಒಂದು ವಿಶ್ವಾಸಾರ್ಹ ಮೂಲ ಒಂದು ಸಾಲಿನ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖದ ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಉದ್ಧರಣಗಳನ್ನು ಮತ್ತು ಯಾವುದೇ ಸವಾಲಿಗೆ ಅಥವಾ ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆ ಸವಾಲಿಗೆ ಒದಗಿಸಬೇಕಾಗುತ್ತದೆ ಎಂದು ಸತ್ಯಾಪನಿಕ ನೀತಿ ಹೇಳುತ್ತದೆ. ಆದರೆ,ಎಂದಿಗೂ ಆಕ್ಷೇಪಿಸದ ವಸ್ತುವಿಗೂ ಮೂಲ ಅಸ್ತಿತ್ವದಲ್ಲಿರಬೇಕು.ಉದಾಹರಣೆಗೆ: "ಫ್ರಾನ್ಸ್ ರಾಜಧಾನಿ ಪ್ಯಾರಿಸ್" ಹೇಳಿಕೆಗೆ ಯಾವುದೇ ಮೂಲದ ಅಗತ್ಯವಿಲ್ಲ. ಏಕೆಂದರೆ, ಯಾರೂ ಇದನ್ನು ವಿರೋಧಿಸಲು ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆ ಇಲ್ಲ ಮತ್ತು ಅದಕ್ಕೆ ಮೂಲಗಳು ಅಸ್ತಿತ್ವದಲ್ಲಿವೆ ಎಂದು ನಮಗೆ ತಿಳಿದಿದೆ. ಒಂದು ಹೇಳಿಕೆ ಕಾರಣವೆನ್ನಬಹುದು, ಸಹ ಕಾರಣವೆಂದು ಅಲ್ಲ.
Despite the need to attribute content to reliable sources, you must not plagiarize them or violate their copyrights. Articles should be written in your own words while substantially retaining the meaning of the source material.
"No original research" (NOR) is one of three core content policies that, along with Neutral point of view and Verifiability, determines the type and quality of material acceptable in articles. Because these policies work in harmony, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another, and editors should familiarize themselves with all three. For questions about whether any particular edit constitutes original research, see the NOR noticeboard.
'''Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing sources within the provisions of this and other content policies is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia. Best practice is to research the most reliable sources on the topic and summarize what they say in your own words, with each statement in the article attributable to a source that makes that statement explicitly. Source material should be carefully summarized or rephrased without changing its meaning or implication. Take care not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources, or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intention of the source, such as using material out of context. In short, stick to the sources.▼
If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery.'''▼
▲Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing sources within the provisions of this and other content policies is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia. Best practice is to research the most reliable sources on the topic and summarize what they say in your own words, with each statement in the article attributable to a source that makes that statement explicitly. Source material should be carefully summarized or rephrased without changing its meaning or implication. Take care not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources, or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intention of the source, such as using material out of context. In short, stick to the sources.
▲If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery.
Reliable sources[ಮೂಲವನ್ನು ಸಂಪಾದಿಸು]
Further information: Wikipedia:Verifiabilityಮತ್ತು Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
'''Any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by a reliable source. Material for which no reliable source can be found is considered original research. The only way you can show your edit is not original research is to cite a reliable published source that contains the same material. Even with well-sourced material, if you use it out of context, or to advance a position not directly and explicitly supported by the source, you are engaging in original research; see below.'''
In general, the most reliable sources are:
peer-reviewed journals
| |||